Sic 'em, Bernie! (O'Reilly 9/27)

by **Tiffany** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:31 pm

Ooooh! Did you guys see our boy on O'Reilly tonight?

Man, he was on tonight. Way to be, Bernie.

And apparently I'm not the only one who thought so:

http://www.bernardgoldberg.com/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=2

**Sponsor**

by **nelliedog** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:10 am

WAY YO GO, Bernie! GREAT rant on O'Reilly. You said what has needed to be said for several decades! You were "smokin" and right on target.
Simply Outstanding!

by **jehosafats** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:56 pm

He made himself look like a blithering idiot

http://www.bernardgoldberg.com/phpBB2/v ... php?t=8859

by **MrSinatra** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:59 pm

another crack like that and you'll be banned. keep it CIVIL.

by **Bernie** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:57 pm

Thanks T and Nelliedog ... I appreciate the kind words and the support. It means a lot to me.

by **jam24u** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:07 pm

very impressive when the site owner shows up. must be viewing here more than i thought or hoped.

by **Bernie** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:45 pm

Thanks. You never know when I may be "lurking." Seriously, I enjoy reading (most of) what you guys write.

by **Tiffany** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:06 pm

Bernie wrote:Thanks T and Nelliedog ... I appreciate the kind words and the support. It means a lot to me.

You're welcome! And it's phenomenally easy to support you and your views.

Btw, I'm still so weirded out that you're a real person who's not just on TV. :wink:

by **I.j.h.a.q** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:51 am

Tiffany wrote:
Bernie wrote:Thanks T and Nelliedog ... I appreciate the kind words and the support. It means a lot to me.

You're welcome! And it's phenomenally easy to support you and your views.

Btw, I'm still so weirded out that you're a real person who's not just on TV.

That's not Mr. S., Tiffany? Because I went through some 121 posts which were posted under the, Bernie, name, and I find that the composition is almost identical between posts made by Mr. S. and Bernie. Just my suspicion here, but he makes no posts since May under that name, then, I make a question about, Bernie, not posting on this site, and then two of Bernie's posts appear out of the blue. I call BULL

by **Tiffany** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:12 am

I.j.h.a.q wrote:
Tiffany wrote:
Bernie wrote:Thanks T and Nelliedog ... I appreciate the kind words and the support. It means a lot to me.

You're welcome! And it's phenomenally easy to support you and your views.

Btw, I'm still so weirded out that you're a real person who's not just on TV.

That's not Mr. S., Tiffany? Because I went through some 121 posts which were posted under the, Bernie, name, and I find that the composition is almost identical between posts made by Mr. S. and Bernie. Just my suspicion here, but he makes no posts since May under that name, then, I make a question about, Bernie, not posting on this site, and then two of Bernie's posts appear out of the blue. I call BULL

I hate to do this to you, honey, but I'm sure Sinatra doesn't even remember you posting anything about that b/c I don't.

It's not Sinatra, b/c since no promises are made regarding Bernie posting, what would be the point?

I don't know what to tell you if you don't believe it's him, except that in general you may be giving your skepticism some false importance. I'm sure Sinatra didn't even know about it.

Sorry.

by **Bernie** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:21 am

Just so you know: when something is posted under my name ... only one person wrote it: Me. Mr. S writes his own stuff; I write mine. Why the cynicism? Why the assumption that I wouldn't (from time to time, given my schedule) thank my friends for taking part in important discussions about the media? You don't have to agree with me -- that's for sure. But please don't jump to dopey conclusions that I don't express my own ideas ... right here on this site.

Regards

by **Tiffany** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:31 am

So cool that you're posting, Bernie!

See ijhaq? I try not to be one of those people who says I told you so...

I suppose I'm a little more passive-aggressive, b/c instead I say things like, I try not to be one of those people who says I told you so. :lol:

by **Cortese** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:22 am

I'll admit that I was becoming suspicious myself. It stemmed from the Rosie O'Donnell/The View comments that Bernie made a while ago. Obviously it aggitated a few people who posted in the "Ask Bernie" section. What ended up happening is that Mr. S defended Bernie's viewpoint but I honestly wanted to hear from Bernie himself why he felt the way he did. Is this being cynical? Sure. Dopey? No, but thank you for at least clarifying things.

by **I.j.h.a.q** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:17 pm

Cortese wrote:I'll admit that I was becoming suspicious myself. It stemmed from the Rosie O'Donnell/The View comments that Bernie made a while ago. Obviously it aggitated a few people who posted in the "Ask Bernie" section. What ended up happening is that Mr. S defended Bernie's viewpoint but I honestly wanted to hear from Bernie himself why he felt the way he did. Is this being cynical? Sure. Dopey? No, but thank you for at least clarifying things.

I don't care, I'll be dopey then. I don't have to buy it period, and don't. I evaluate it a number of ways such as understanding that many people from Bernie's profession would besiege him here just to get a dig in, and they don't. So they seem not to buy it either, and using that as one of my barometers of reality I am sticking to such dopiness. I am going to do my best though in letting this go because I do realize that I am in a no win situation to push my assumptions any further here on this site. I refuse to be made into that "The Odd Couple" skit from the 1970's.

Oh, BTW to those of obvious motivations, I am a master at sociological warfare myself, but this all takes the cake in regard to anything I've ever tried.

by **Bernie** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:28 pm

Just one brief question, IJHAQ, regarding your last post: Huh?