by acmemindguard » Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:25 pm
Thank you for those words and your points are well taken. I grew up in the Bronx and like Balitmore watched my city rise and fall like the tide. Fortunately as a child I never went hungry, was never homeless, and when my Dad lost his job in the 1960's we were lucky enough to have my Mom's family see us through those very difficult times. I would be remiss if I did not agree that America is facing its greatest social crisis since the Depression Era but this is a crisis of our own making. When the welfare system specifically ADC began in 1935 as part of the New Deal it encouraged the break down of the family and the creation of a permanent underclass. It discouraged women from entering the workforce and yes, encouraged women to have children as a source of income. The program targeted people of color who were the most marginalized demographic in our society and penalized the biological father of these children from participating in their lives. Despite men abandoning their children, women were left to try to rise above this State sponsored relegation to the underclass. Recognizing the bleakness of the American Woman's future and their socioeconomic state the National Organization of Women was formed in 1966 to: ""To take action to bring women into full participation in the mainstream of American society now, exercising all privileges and responsibilities thereof in truly equal partnership with men." We all know how that turned out and just to remind you it has been 40 years since we sent the ERA to the States for ratification and we are still waiting. The Vietnam War cost the lives of more than 58,000 US soldiers and as a result many more women and their children were forced on to the dole. Having no mandate for equality in our society, social or economic, American women gritted their teeth and through their biological superiority and love for their colorless children raised an entire generation practically alone. In the 1980's the Reagan Administration changed the Social Security laws and cut the death benefits for children from age 25 to age 18. This resulted in the inability of many young people to afford college and/or trade school and created what has now become the student loan debacle. In 1996 President Clinton, (who himself never knew his father and whose own mother was marginalized for a time), attempted to overhaul a welfare system that had created this underclass. He limited the number of years that benefits could be collected to a lifetime limit of 5 years. These reforms also discouraged women from having additional children for monetary reasons and encouraged birth control. In addition to these welfare reforms the Clinton Administration with the assistance of a bipartisan Congress created education and job opportunities for women which trickled down to their children. My point here is that Mr Goldberg's commentary sounds very much what we Feminists refer to as the "Man in the House" solution. The underlying message there is, that it is women who are to blame for our current socioeconomic conditions and that if we only had a man in the house to care for us and our children society would be a better place. Historically men have always abandoned their children and always for their own selfish means and Women have been left to raise civilizations. If Mr Golberg and men like him really want to change a society where women's wombs and the children they bear are socioeconimic chattel then maybe they need to use their power of the media to bring attention the root cause of the current dilemma, the inequality of women and the impotence of men.
Miss K.