Why the Media is liberal

Discuss the various aspects of Bernard Goldberg's "Bias," the smash bestseller with all the inside baseball from one of their own! Discuss the various aspects of Arrogance, the 2nd NYT's bestseller.

Why the Media is liberal

Unread postby Rome » Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:23 pm

Subject: Why is the Media liberal?

There is a fancy entertained by conservative talk show hosts, like Sean and Neal, that the journalists in the democrat media, whose specialty is fiction, may actually believe they are reporting in a fair and balanced way, and not deliberately slanting the news.
Bernard Goldberg, in his book on the subject: "Bias", is also of that fancy.
Their tacit premise is that people like Jennings, Rather, Brokaw, the hacks at CNN, et al. are delusional.
"Tell me where is fancy bred?  
Or in the heart or in the head?
How begot, how nourished?"
No sane person could possibly air selected items, or deliberately bury or quickly brush aside stories, because they are about felonies of democrats (Sandy Berger) or the United Nations - Iraqi oil for food bribes, (socialists) and not know exactly what he is doing.
They gave The Rapist an eight year pass, and even now let him off Scot free, so as not to damage the reputation of the democrat party.
What more does anyone need to prove their willful bias?
No investigation of his rapes, his batteries, the over 50 murders, or so called suicides or accidents, of people associated with the Clintons.
Isn't that so absolutely ridiculous, that a president of the United States, a Baptist from little old Arkansas, could be the initiator of murders on that scale? Rapes?
Why its laughable. What is he, Caligula? MacBeth and Lady MacBeth?
How paranoid! Another right wing kook theory!
It is merely a statistical anomaly that these murdered people had direct dealings with the Clintons!
No, this is not six degrees of Kevin Bacon.
Whatever you do, don't Google: people Clinton murdered. It is not fiction.
Oh, OK, if you must.
"This is no dream! This is really happening!" Yes, Rosemary, it is.
They make farcical investigations, on occasion, such as the 60 minute fairy tale on the death of Vince Foster, ending with Mike Wallace coming out of the Laundromat with a white wash.
He committed suicide outside the park, and then walked into the park,
because it was a nicer place to be dead.
"This be the verse you grave for me:
Here he lies where he longed to be;"
I suppose if the Clintons ever swing from a cottonwood tree, Vince would have a peaceful requiem.
Whatever else, the media is sane and committed; though to any informed person, such as these same media people, the democrat-socialist philosophy they espouse promotes widespread poverty and human misery.
Impoverishing, and making dependent, the average American, is the calculated, conscious aim of the left wing media and the democrat party.
Poverty among Americans promotes television viewing, as poor people have little choice in entertainment or other disposition of their leisure time.
Larger TV audiences, mean greater power and more money to these egotists, and unlike some media people with integrity, like Lisa Myers and Brit Hume, and Fox News in general, money and power is the religion of these people.
We will never forget Lisa's documentary on Clinton's brutal rape of Juanita Broderick, where he almost bit her lip off, and while NBC was trying to spike the story, we will also never forget, Brit's "Free Lisa Myers" button.
Brent Bozell, in his new book, "Weapons of Mass Distortion", gives hundreds of examples of media bias, for those who want details.
In their reporting of the war, the democrat media gives aid and comfort to terrorists, as terror attacks make for increased viewing of the news.
Call them "insurgents". Call them "militants".
But never call them terrorists; that might discourage them in some way.
Interfering with our government making terrorists talk, as in Abu Ghraib, and also interfering with finding, arresting, prosecuting, or killing of terrorists is a priority for them.
Less terror attacks mean less TV viewing, less money and power for Jennings-Rather-Brokaw.
"J, do you know what you just wrote?".
"He knows, doctor, he knows."
"Let's get the hell out of here."
Elephants have not forgotten that men of evil, like Stalin, Cinton, Mrs. Clinton, oh sorry, she's not a man have always existed, and will continue to exist.
Jackasses, having a memory span of a nanosecond, can't believe humans could be that bad.
Somehow I feel sorry for the jackass.
A humble animal, who nature "gave once her flowers to love, her ways to roam".
A dumb beast, burdened by man, that works hard, and asks for little.
(A frame of mind unknown to democrats.)
And it is the symbol of the party of human degradation.
I wonder if the democrats would consider another symbol. Say: O. J. Simpson?
(Join our party, and the media will let you get away with murder.)
And let the jackass go back to the farm, shucked of its unasked for burden of shame.
Sean and Neal, rationalize the actions of their friends or acquaintances in the democrat media. It is the grease that makes for everyday living with them.
In an essay, Cicero states that friendship is only possible between men of virtue.
Does Sean really think his friend, Lanny Davis, is virtuous?
Davis is a partisan liar, who put on a sham show of concern, when The Rapist went in for quadruple bypass surgery. As if Davis was totally innocent of the knowledge of The Rapist's felonies, and his death on the operating table would not at least be an end to further crimes he could commit; though justice would still not be fully served by anything less than Clinton's public trial and public execution for
a) treason b) murder c) because it would be fun d) it would create employment for hangmen and carpenters e) all of the above.
Further, Cicero notes:
"The real limit to be observed in friendship is this: the characters of two friends must be stainless. There must be complete harmony of interests, purpose, and aims, without exception."
So much for alleged friendship between Sean and Davis.
Utopians, who want to help people, are emotional, rather than cerebral in hearing the news.
Frequently these people have no real interest in the details of politics, and buy into the democrat "caring" snake oil, because it echoes their real concern for humanity.
Such people are often honorable and make charming friends.
With lying democrat partisans, friendship is not possible, only something in the shadows, where each party uses the other for its own purposes.
"Where is comfort? In division of the records of the mind?
Can I part her from herself, and love her as I knew her, kind?"
We part our friends who think they are democrats from their philosophies, we part them from themselves.
As they do we.
Sometimes they are politically awakened by Rush, or Sean, or Neal, or others in public or private life.
Sometimes they are not. C'est la vie.
But aside from politics we have "laughter learned of friends", and that is enough.
Are our problems more complicated than in the Rome of two millennia ago?
God knows.
If "complete harmony" was possible then, it surely is rarer now.
William F. Buckley Jr. decades ago, remarked that young people today would rather betray their country, than betray their friend.
Now, those once young people have a name: Clinton, Kerry, Edwards.
Betrayal of country, and the ideals of freedom, is the template of the democrats.
Dan Rather may be guilty of treason, giving aid and comfort to Saddam Hussein, as Ronald Reagan remarked about Walter Cronkite, and the latter's canard about the Tet offensive.
I never knew we won that offensive, or what Reagan said about Cronkite.
My thanks to Ann Coulter and others, for enlightenment on the subject.
No, I did not research it myself.
If Ann Coulter says something, I believe it. And decades before Ann, if William F. Buckley Jr. said something, I believed him, and still take his word to the bank.
Then the broadcast media had a monopoly.
Now, through the Internet and cable, and Paul Harvey and talk shows, and others, the truth gets out.
Endemic socialism has pervaded the media for generations and is perpetuated by the deliberate hiring of people who will continue their culture of treason, with a few conservatives thrown in, for lagniappe.
Yes, they are active cultures, Dammem.
Jerome Ostrom
Jerome Ostrom
Braintweezers.com
Rome315@aol.com
Rome
New Member
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Cumming, Georgia

Why the Media is liberal

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Unread postby Woody » Sat Jul 09, 2005 11:38 pm

what a pant load
"The pioneers of a warless world are
the youth that refuse military service." - Albert Einstein
Woody
Media observer
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Pac NW

Unread postby LTC » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:59 pm

rome

i hope you are now in a peace of mind and completed your mission in life by reposting the November 1, 2004 post from the "Montykins" website.

http://www.montykins.com/mkins/000009.html
LTC
Media observer
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:53 am
Location: Houston Texas

Angry Ranters

Unread postby DonKeehotey » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:26 am

These angry ranters need to cut down on the caffeine and check out our easygoing satire website: http://www.shamelesspublicity.com

At least they can catch their breath!
DonKeehotey
New Member
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:59 am
Location: Dallas

Unread postby SincereRadical » Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:00 pm

Big corporations own the media, they are not liberal--ergo, the media cannot be liberal, at least in my view of what actual liberalism is.
SincereRadical
 

Unread postby MrSinatra » Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:01 pm

and what is that?
SYF Rocks!
www.LION-Radio.org

steve1633 wrote:if you havent realized yet that pp posts offer little in the way of intelligent discourse then youre dumber than i suspected, if its just easier to argue with someone like her then ya go ahead keep it up.
User avatar
MrSinatra
Mod Team
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:24 am
Location: 6' under

Unread postby Santiago » Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:46 am

SincereRadical wrote:Big corporations own the media, they are not liberal--ergo, the media cannot be liberal, at least in my view of what actual liberalism is.

This is a common and oft repeated logical fallacy. The big corporations that own the various media outlets do not determine policy, the producers and editors (who are usually overwhelmingly liberal) do.
"A free people claim their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate."
Thomas Jefferson, Rights of British America, 1774
User avatar
Santiago
Media observer
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:18 am

Unread postby TakedownBush » Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:18 pm

Where is your evidence for this Clinton rape idea that is BS. I found little truth in what you said. IF this is what you truly believe then you should Read The biggest secret by David Icke, which would go along with what you said because of how much made truths are in the book. If you truly believe that Clinton did this then give me some flawless truth that can be credited by both democrats and republicans
The conservatives conserve for themselves and no one else.
TakedownBush
Media observer
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Illinois

Unread postby WeaponOfMassInstruction » Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:02 pm

I want to say that the woman who accused Clinton of raping her was Juanita Broadrick. If I recall correctly, the Big Three News networks declined to interview her because the accusation was so tawdry. She got almost zero coverage...now compare that to Cindy Sheehan.

Oh...and a correspondent who went to pre-interview Ms. Broadrick said that she and her story were "very credible". Despite that, the Big Three refused to do their job and cover it.
"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views."
William F. Buckley, Jr.
User avatar
WeaponOfMassInstruction
Mod Team
 
Posts: 3854
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 5:38 pm
Location: Alabama

Unread postby Ballsyone » Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:16 pm

sorry, i'm an idiot.
Ballsyone
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: FL 410

Re: Why the Media is liberal

Unread postby Rome » Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:45 am

Hey Goldberg:
You call me a bias and arrogant fan. I don't have a biased or arrogant bone in my body.
And as far as being a fan of yours, you are delusional, Bernie. So freak off.
Jerome Ostrom
Braintweezers.com
Rome315@aol.com
Rome
New Member
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Cumming, Georgia

Re: Why the Media is liberal

Unread postby Media Rookie » Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:44 pm

Rome wrote:Hey Goldberg:
You call me a bias and arrogant fan. I don't have a biased or arrogant bone in my body.
And as far as being a fan of yours, you are delusional, Bernie. So freak off.


Um, the description is a rating (for lack of a better word) according to how many posts you make on the site. It isn't a description of you personally or your politics.
"Well, today's eight-year-olds are tomorrow's teenagers. I say this calls for action and now. Nip it in the bud. First sign of youngsters going wrong, you've got to nip it in the bud." - Barney Fife
User avatar
Media Rookie
Media watchdog!
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Why the Media is liberal

Unread postby charlie johnson » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:16 pm

Why is the media liberal? If you go back in history far enough you might see the simplicity of the matter.Liberals are Marxist in golf britches. Marx was a clerk at a clerk school. ( Not a working person) Marx is known as the big daddy of communism. You naturally think communist are working folks. The flag of the USSR had a hammer and another farm tool on it.But what really happened? The clerks ran the operation behind desk,Just as Marx did. Do you notice farmers sit at a desk? How about the coal miner? The construction worker? NOPE! They do the work.The commies sit at desk and divide things up. The power is in the hands of clerks.Eventually the USSR crashed and burned.Why? Unhappy working folks refused to play their game.Did you notice that Castro was an ambulance chaser?Well educated.Not a peon. Then there was early America. We had a great industry here in the past. A lot of the peons developed good products by inventing them and producing them.He came from the working class.Except maybe the Vanderbuilts. George Westinghouse got his hands dirty working, Until about 1960 many factory owners came up from the bottom.Henry Ford is an example.Eventually the younger generation went off to universities. When the old owner would stay near the work and the workers,The children moved away to a nice secluded place with plush carpet.( Away from the work and the workers)They sit .Liberals like Marxist like to sit. The old conservatives used to work.The men were conservatives .The clerks were golfers .Never get your hands dirty and demand respect.Today we are a nation of liberal desk sitters.Rich liberals admire Castro.He gets cheap labor without the guilt trip. But today the conservative is a goner,The real conservative is.Did Rush Limbaugh ever do a real job? Has he invented any useful devices? Or did he live a life at a desk? In DC ,The nations capitol,It is always under control of liberals.Even in the time of Reagan. Liberals sit.The town is full of desk. Nobody likes to work,They hire everything done,Even our rich inventors of today build clerk tools.That is what Bill Gates does.The workers in China build the hardware. They own us. They are conservatives. They know the value of a dollar. (Which ain't much today.)Thanks to commie liberal sitters. Notice the trade of our golfing parrot? Has he done anything other than sit? Was the pyramids built by words or deeds?
charlie johnson
Media analyst
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:06 am


Return to BIAS: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, & ARROGANCE: Rescuing America From the Media Elite

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron