BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Place for comments, discussions, and debate on topics raised during Bernie's TV segments.

BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby EKIM » Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:37 pm

WOW!!!!! I saw you on Bill O'Reilly tonight and you are my new hero!!! You proved tonight that you tell the truth as you see it!!
Bill tried to say that the looney left had jumped on politicizing the Connecticut shootings on Friday but that FOXNEWS had been mute on that score prefering to allow a time of mourning. You informed him that the far right had been vocal as well saying that the fringe right had blamed the tragedy on "sin" and "abortion"! Bill said, "Not on Foxnews" but you corrected him there as well! When he said "maybe so but not in a predominent way", you corrected him here as well!!! YOU ARE MY HERO, Bernie! You are not scared of anything or anyone!!!
EKIM
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:19 pm

BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby Spooked » Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:57 pm

I want to disagree with your comment tonight on O-Reilly. The probelm is taking pray out of the schools, and God out of our lives. Please don't tune me out but polease listen. There is a beginning for everything. A seed needs to be planted for snything to grow. The stats will show that since we took pray out of the schools our country began a down word spiral which is so far out of control now that only a miracle will spot it. The seed is pray in a smal;l childs life and the belief in a supreme power that prepares them for a life of good moral judgement and a conscience that will help them be a better person in their life. We have to get back to the basics and the founding of proper child raising and fathers in the home.

Even if you don't believe in God this definetly won't hurt. If there is a God he will return with Fire. Not a good gamble to make especially for the small price he asks us to pay.

What's wrong in America? I work in Law enforcement, I deal with Offenders with Drug addiction. A big percentage of them have been arrested and found in possession of a firearm by a restricted person. It is illegal for a Felon to own or be in possession of a firearm. So, obviously taking guns from honest people will not stop the problem. All of these offenders have Anger management issues. This was instilled in them when they were very young and remains with them their entire life, unless some how someone is able to reach them and help them create change. It is very obvious the the failure in the home is at the root of our problems. Belief is God certainly won't hurt anyone with that.
Spooked
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:13 pm

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby kbraun3394 » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:19 am

My first post:

Your comments on O'Reilly were distorted a bit when you commented that those of us are politicizing the school killing in Connecticut by stating that the shooter is a reflection of our political system which allows the murdering of unborn babies by late term abortions. This is is not a political statement coming from me, but an observation of the truth. Of course, the shooter cares less about abortion or any other politically correct policy, This is not the point, and I think with your intelligence you can figure this one out for yourself. If society, through its educational system disregards moral values in teaching children traditional family values, and promote humanist ideology, this makes a perfect breeding ground for sociopaths.

What all these killers have in common is they all attended public schools that promote a secular agenda (handing out condoms, and birth control pills, with no regard for moral standards. Not only does the educational system promote anti Christian values, the system will not allow any teaching of what haas been traditionally considered normal and righteous. In fact, many schools are not teaching homosexual marriage is normal, and it is a good thing that homosexuals can adopt children (how perverted is this?).

Maybe, instead of banning automatic weapons we should ban public education.

Regards,

Ken Brown
kbraun3394
New Member
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby kbraun3394 » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:27 am

I made a couple of typos - should be many schools are now teaching that homosexuality is normal (how perverted?) -

what all recent shooters have in common is they all attended public schools, What are they being taught? May have an influence on their behavior, you think?

Maybe we should ban public schools and forget about banning guns. Seems that the real problem is not being addressed.
kbraun3394
New Member
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby Neilsd » Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:09 am

Hi Bernie:

I really think you and Bill need to have a basic understanding of the difference between a "clip" and a "magazine" before saying on national TV you don't support ASSAULT WEAPONS. What's an assault weapon Bernie? Guess what, (I didn't really hear you) but what you and Bill think you know about firearms is wholly innaccurate. Once you go shoot and spend an hour or two at a range with a firearms instructor - then you and Bill should have a less ignorant discussion about what you think - when you just don't know the basics.

Bernie, did you know that a concealed carry permit holder drew his weapon in the Oregon mall shooting - and the shooter ran away - then committed suicide? It has not been reported. Why not Bernie? http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-a ... 93571.html

Also, your mention of mental health is essential. Here a mother of an adult child with autism - where controlling outrage is proving impossible and the government has to help this mom: http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archiv ... zas-mother

You and Bill need to focus on how concealed weapons holders (Florida now has 9 million citizens - well it was just announced 1 million of them have a concealed carry permit. Come on Bernie. Help make sure solutions are debated - not knee-jerk nonsense. Tell Bill I said that too.

Thanks,

Neil Darling
Marist '92
Neilsd
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:52 am

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby elvisofmemphis » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:23 pm

Your comments on O'Reilly last night were intellectual potpourri. You said you believe in the second amendment, but that you believe that certain of these weapons should be banned. The latter part of that statement demonstrates that the former part cannot be true. You cannot believe in an amendment which you apparently do not understand. By use of what Dr. Thomas Sowell calls "verbal virtuosity", the elite have coined the phrase "assault weapons" and maintain that because they, whatever they are, are not generally used for hunting, they can be constitutionally banned and ought to be. Distinguishing hunting weapons from others, within the confines of the second amendment is another piece of verbal virtuosity. The second amendment is meant to assure the means of protecting themselves from an oppressive government to the people. Hunting is nowhere contemplated there. A well regulated militia, however, is mentioned. In 1789 it was recognized that the militias from around the colonies had greatly contributed to the successful revolution against the oppressive government of the King. Militias were raised as the need arose. Citizens brought their guns and formed themselves into organized militias, choosing their officers and entering the fray. It is key to recognize that they came with their own arms. In the event, God forbid, that some future government in the United States attempts to become tyrannical, it may be incumbent upon the people to form such militias. I am not an alarmist. I am not expecting such a circumstance. Yet, we must anticipate such and protect our second amendment right to be as ready as we can be. In fact, in modern times, a people who will depose a tyrant needs much more that AR-15's and AK-47's. Recognizing that any government within the United States which may become oppressive has at its disposal such weapons as armed drones, missiles, tanks, military airplanes, tanks, mortars, RPG's and an unknown additional arsenal, it is unlikely that even AK-47's will be adequate for the protection of the people. The people of Lybia who overthrew the tyrant, Ghadaffi, the people of Egypt who overthrew Mubarek, the people of Syria, trying to overthrow Bashar-Al-Assad all have required access to real weapons of war. Obtaining them has been a process which began with their possession of smaller weapons, including those you propose banning, using them to capture the real weapons of war for their use against the tyrants. As I have said, I do not expect a tyrant to emerge in this country. However, there are laws in place which would make that quite easily accomplished under the auspices of a national emergency and martial law. So, please do not present the impossibility of such occurrence here as axiomatic rather than an issue open to discussion. Please think through your stated belief in the second amendment and how that should compel you to oppose these weapons bans.
elvisofmemphis
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:23 am

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby PBreit » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:13 pm

Don't know whether or not you were referring to Gov. Huckabee's comments when you compared FOX exploitation of Sandy Hook to MSM's exploitation for gun control purposes. To use a hackneyed phrase, it's comparing apples to oranges. APPLES: It's not that prayer is a magical incantation that rids us of all evil, but prayer honors GOD. When we honor Him, he extends His arm of protection around us, as He has done since the foundation of this nation and Israel. But these days, the collective WE of America have shown GOD the door. We want Him out of the Public Square and even out of the Manger. He will not force Himself or His protection on us. WE turn our back on Him, He warns then leaves US. ORANGES: Gun violence and gun control are specific consequences or outcomes of this TRUTH. Gov. Huckabee was right (but unfortunately began retreating from his position it seems).
PBreit
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:21 pm

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby kbraun3394 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:21 pm

Dear Mr. Goldberg:

More information for those of you who are blaming the atrocities (killing school children) on guns instead of looking at the true cause (What is wrong with the truth?):

I am “Adam Lanza’s” Doctor
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:59

Share

inShare
10

(Before It's News)



I posted this in response to the “I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother” article that has been making the Internet rounds. In this time of horrific tragedy, let your voice be heard by decision makers:http://tinyurl.com/PsychDrugsKill. Please share this link with all your circles of influence. REL





I Am “Adam Lanza’s” Doctor


I have treated “Adam Lanza”, male and female, young and old, for decades.

I am a Child, Adolescent and Adult Psychiatrist. I did my psychiatric residency at Lincoln Hospital and, along with my child psychology residency, also at St. Luke’s Hospital of Columbia University.

I have worked with Autistic people of all ages, the Asberger’s Syndrome people, Schrizophrenic people, BiPolar people, Multiple Personality Disorder people, OCD, ADD, ADHD, and pretty much every other type of labeled person in my 42+ year career since graduating from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City.

And I have never written a prescription for a psychiatric drug. Or any other type of drug, for that matter.

I have, while serving as the Acting Director for a Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Ward of a large hospital not very far from Newtown, CT, looked at the drugged, disoriented, drooling and dangerous children in my care ranging from age 4 to 16 and take ALL of them off all psychiatric medication, weaning them carefully, of course, because I simply could not tell what we were dealing with other than drug-damaged brains and bodies of the young and very young kids I had under my care.

The nurses told me I could not do that because they could not contain the children. I asked them how they knew that since the children who were violent, homicidal and suicidal were ALL on drugs known to make them violent, homicidal and suicidal.

They told me that I could not do that and that they would go to the union to prevent me from taking the kids off their meds. I replied that the meds were not the kids’ meds. They were the staff’s meds since they kept the staff comfortable and feeling safe.

They went to the Union. I had my physician’s license in CT, a Union Card that trumped theirs.

The 4 year old on 11 different psychiatric medications who was toe walking (a sign of neurological damage in a 4 year old) and who wanted to die stopped drooling and spinning around in circles when she came off the meds.

I was the first person to ask he why she had plunged a knife into Mommy’s boyfriend’s leg when he was asleep. She told me “He was hurting me down there [pointing to her vagina] every night and Mommy would not stop him”. When the event occurred, she was medicated without a single person taking a moment to ask why the act had taken place.

You see, I am old enough to have learned my craft and art BEFORE the advent of untested, highly profitable, and totally unconscionable psychiatric drugs. I read the literature on these neurological poisons and saw that the long terms studies were absent, that the pediatric studies were absent and that the advertising-supported “impartial” journals were nothing more than paper prostitutes all dressed up in paper dresses and glossy ads.

I watched in horror as younger and younger children were placed on stronger and stronger drugs for less and less indication (although, admittedly, in my mind there is no justification for the use of any psychiatric drug).

I learned orthomolecular medicine and psychiatry. That works. I learned how to listen and move people toward emotional health. That works too. I learned how to employ NeuroBioFeedback to teach the brain how to regulate itself and the body in harmony with its capacity and needs. That works fantastically well. I learned how to use frequency medicine, homeopathy, herbal medicine, intravenous nutrition and a variety of other modalities which actually support healing. They work.

I learned how to use nutrition, diet and detoxification, for which I studied Environmental Medicine. That works.

What does not work is drugging the brain with toxins which create the very symptoms for which the drugs are given in the first place.

I have met and held “Adam Lanza’s” mother in my arms as she wept in fear and exhausted despair. And I have held her in my arms as she wept for the joy of having her child clear eyed and of sound mind not in moments of quick hope, but continually and consistently.

I have held “Adam Lanza’s” mother’s hand in court as we pressured his school to give him the education he needed, not the one that they made money on from destructive State subsidies for the correct diagnosis and another drugged kid.

I have sat with “Adam’s” brothers and sisters helping them to undo the trauma that Adam-on-drugs has brought to their lives.

“Adam Lanza” and I have spent hours together as he climbed out of the pit of his own psychosis, without drugs, confinement or violence, but not necessarily smoothly, either.

And I have attended the funeral of more than 1 “Adam Lanza” whose family pressured his mom, or whose divorced parent pressured the custodial parent through the Court, to put “Adam” on drugs – and then did not even have the good grace or decency to accept responsibility for his death.

We know of absolutely no chemical imbalance to account for mental and emotional illness. We know that genes are disrupted so function is distorted by a host of causes, chief among which are heavy metals like mercury and industrial poisons like formaldehyde, fluoride and foreign DNA and proteins which call forth an auto immune reaction and cause neurological disruption.

This is a type of expression of a larger cause of disability I have called “Genome Disruption Syndrome” or GDS (www.GDS-Therapy.com). It, not a psuedo-science “genetic drift”, accounts for the changes in the human genome which are linked to increased cancer rates, autism, increased diabetes rates and the other chronic, degenerative diseases which were virtually unknown in our grandparents and parents childhoods. The genome is the same. The genomic disruption is by no means the same.

Adam was, according to his uncle, being “treated” with Fantapt, a novel, and highly dangerous anti-psychotic previously rejected by the FDA for its high side effect profile, including aggression and psychosis.*

But he was also vaccinated. So this Adam Lanza was toxic with thimerosol (49.6% mercury by weight), formaldehyde, fluoride, MSG, foreign DNA, diploid cells, foreign protein, Polysorbate 80 (or “TWEEN”) and other systemic toxins injected into his body regardless of their toxicity and regardless of his ability to remove them from his body.

So this Adam was neurotoxic — a victim of Genome Disruption.

His mother, I must also presume, had no intent to harm him when she allowed his genome to be repeatedly overwhelmed with unnecessary and dangerous vaccines and then, similarly, with dangerous and unnecessary psychiatric medications. No, I am sure that she followed the perhaps-well-intentioned advice of experts who themselves have suspended their capacity to evaluate data and instead rely on the herd’s belief that since it is said so often, the safety and efficacy of the drugs and vaccines purveyed so beautifully in the journals and ads, seminars and trainings (complete with pizza and salad during a busy lunch in a windowless conference room in the clinic or hospital) must be safe and effective.

They are neither and the “Adam Lanza’s” and their mothers, sisters, brothers, fathers, neighbors and, today, his grieving neighbors in Newton, CT. can testify to that.

There is a time to say NO. That time has arrived. No to psychiatric drugs. There is ALWAYS a better way. More than half of the people who kill themselves are on psychiatric drugs.

No to vaccines. There could not be a worse way. Virtually every modern outbreak and epidemic takes place in the fully vaccinated, to which the vaccine pusher’s retort is, “Well, give peoplemore vaccine doses since 2 (or 3, or 4 or more) did not work. Call them boosters!” I call them Genome Disruption.

No to GMOs which are likewise altering our very genome.

Psychiatric drugs kill both those who take them and those they turn on.

They are unnecessary and dangerous, but oh, so profitable.

See my video, blog and take action here now:
http://tinyurl.com/PsychDrugsKill

Let your voice be heard by decision makers:
http://tinyurl.com/PsychDrugsKill

All of our children are Adam Lanzas; all of them are his victims.
kbraun3394
New Member
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby kbraun3394 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:08 pm

Hey Bernie:

I just received this post on my Facebook page from a person who makes a pretty good point and asked some provocative questions. Maybe, you can get the fact (the last ones) accurate, You help will be appreciated.

This school shooting official story doesn't pass the smell test. It smells like a professional hit with a dead patsy. None of the 'so-called' facts are factual. The kid could not have done the shooting. The coroner says all deaths were caused by .223, but the rifle was in the car. He commits suicide, but not with a 9mm. Why was he wearing body armor and where did he buy it? Remember, he was a painfully shy, 150 lb., autistic kid. He couldn't have carried the 250+ rounds of ammo even if he did return the ar-15 to the car after he killed himself with it. What of the two men apprehended by cops? Sounds like the men on the grassy knoll.... As in JFK's execution, you don't have to know who did the shooting, to know who didn't. Don't think UNITED STATES INC., would do such a thing? Why not, if 60 million dead unborn children is ok, then 20 five-six olds poses no moral dilemma for godless, immoral scum. They have no problem killing Libyan, Syrian and Afghanistan children with drone strikes. One thing is for certain, the enemies of your God-given rights is not about to let a good disaster go to waste. Oh yeah....the 2nd amendment ain't bout hunting. A point about which the elitist, Marxists are all too clear.
kbraun3394
New Member
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: BERNIE GOLDBERG ON BILL O'REILLY DEC 17

Unread postby redton » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:57 pm

I completely agree with EKIM. Bernie was just outstanding. I just wish he had named the Fox shows/personalities that had politicized the Newtown shootings. I also applaud O'Reilly for taking Bernie's criticism -- albeit a little reluctantly. Keep up the great work, Bernie!!
redton
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:45 pm


Return to On TV

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron